Cumulative Lifetime Violence Severity: Does It Make a Difference to the Health of Canadian Men

Main Article Content

Kelly Scott-Storey, Dr.
Sue O'Donnell, Dr.
Judith Wuest


Background and Objective: Interpersonal violence is a major public health problem that is among the top 25 causes of years of life lost worldwide. But how cumulative lifetime violence affects the health of men has received little attention. Our objective was to explore differences in men’s health and health behaviors according to cumulativelifetime violence severity as target and/or perpetrator in a community sample of Canadian men.

Materials and Methods: Data are from a convenience community sample of 590 men, ages 19 to 65, who completed an online survey for the Men’s Violence, Gender and Health Study(MVGHS).  The survey included questions about social location, health behaviours, and health status. Validated measures of depression, anxiety, chronic pain, posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol use also were included. Perceived cumulative lifetime violence severity (LVS) was measured with 64 study-specific items. Based on the median LVS score, the sample was divided into two groups, lower and higher LVS, and compared for significant differences on social location, health behavior, and health variables. Using logistic regression, odds ratios for higher LVS and three selected health outcomes (depression, chronic pain, daily cannabis use) were calculated and adjusted for potential confounders.

Results: On most measures, men with higher LVS had significantly poorer health than those with lower LVS. Alcohol use was not significantly different between groups but was higher than expected for all men. Those with higher LVS had significant odds ratios for depression (OR= 3.71;CI= 2.59, 5.31), daily cannabis use (OR= 3.20;CI= 2.07, 4.92) and chronic pain (OR= 3.19;CI= 1.98, 5.14).  In odds ratio models adjusted for confounders, higher LVS remained significant only for daily cannabis use (aOR= 2.07; CI = 1.23, 3.43) and other significant aORsincluded current smoking, unemployment and difficulty living on current income. In the depression and chronic pain models, common indicators of dysregulation of the body’s natural stress response by violence severity, posttraumatic stress disorder and anxiety respectively, were significant predictors.  Number of chronic health problems and being overwhelmed by daily stress frequently were also significant in the depression model. For chronic pain, number of chronic health problems and injury with permanent disability were both significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide some of the first comparative evidence from a community sample that men with higher cumulativelifetime violence severityare more likely to have poorer health than men with lower LVS. The adjusted models suggest more complex relationships among higher LVS and health outcomes that indicate the need for further exploration of how biophysical consequences of violence, social location and/or comorbidities may moderate or mediate how cumulative violence severity affects men’s health.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Scott-Storey, K., O’Donnell, S., & Wuest, J. (2018). Cumulative Lifetime Violence Severity: Does It Make a Difference to the Health of Canadian Men. International Journal of Mens Social and Community Health, 1(1), e22-e39.
Author Biographies

Kelly Scott-Storey, Dr., University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick

Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing

Dr. Scott-Storey is the first author on this manuscript.

Sue O'Donnell, Dr., University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Nursing

Judith Wuest, University of New Brunswick Faculty of Nursing

Professor Emerita



1. Haegerich T, and Dahlberg L. Violence as a public health risk. J Lifest Med 2011;5:392–406. doi:10.1177/1559827611409127.
2. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional and national age-specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2-13: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;385:117–71. S0140-6736(14)61682-2.
3. Haegerich T, and Hall J. Violence and men’s health: Understanding the etiological underpinnings of men’s experiences with interpersonal violence. Am J Lifestyle Med 2011;5:440–53. doi:10.1177/1559827611410263.
4. Hines DA, and Douglas EM. Women’s use of intimate partner violence against men: prevalence, implications, and consequences. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 2009;18(6): 572–86.
5. McHugh M, Rakowski S, and Siderski C. Men’s experience of psychological abuse: Conceptualization and measurement issues. Sex Roles 2013;69:168–81.
6. Scott-Storey K, O’Donnell S, Ford-Gilboe M et al. Men’s experiences of intimate partner violence. A report commissioned by the Public Health Agency of Canada, Population Health Promotion and Innovation Division; 2017.
7. O’Donnell S, and MacIntosh J. Gender and workplace bullying: Men’s experiences of surviving bullying at work. Qualitat Health Res 2016;26(3):1–16. Doi: 10.1177/1049732314566321
8. Scott-Storey K. Cumulative abuse: Do things add up? An evaluation of the conceptualization, operationalization, and methodological approaches in the study of the phenomenon of cumulative abuse. Trauma Violence Abuse 2011;12(3): 135–50. doi:10.1177/1524838011404253.
9. Leeb R, Lewis T, and Zolotor A. A review of the physical and mental health consequences of child abuse and neglect and the implications for practice. Am J Lifestyle Med 2011;11:254–268. doi: 10.1177/1559827611410266.
10. Turner M, Exum ML, Brame R, et al. Bullying victimization and adolescent mental health: General and typological effects across sex. J Criminal Justice 2013;41:53–59.
11. Breiding M, Black M, and Ryan G. Chronic disease and health risk behaviours associated with intimate partner violence—18 U.S. states/territories, 2005. Ann Epidemiol 2008;18:538–44.
12. Olofsson N, Lindqvist K, Gadin K, et al. Violence against young men and women: A vital health issue. Open Pub Health J 2009;2:1–6. doi:10.2174/1874944500902010001
13. Peterson Z, Voller E, Polusny M, et al. Prevalence and consequence of adult sexual assault of men: Review of the empirical findings and state of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev 2011;31:1–24. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.006.
14. MacIntosh J, Wuest J, and Bulman D. Sustaining men’s sense of self after workplace bullying. NZJHRM 2014;14(2):57–68.
15. O’Donnell S, MacIntosh J., and Bulman D. The support needs of men who are bullied at work. Int J Men’s Health 2017;16(1):1–19. DOI: 10.3149/jmh.1601.1.
16. Stevelink S, Malcolm E, Mason C, et al. The prevalence of mental health disorders in (ex-) military personnel with a physical impairment: A systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2014;72:243–51. doi:10.1136/oemed-2014-102207.
17. Hillberg T, Hamilton-Giachritsis C, and Dixon L. Review of meta-analyses on the association between child sexual abuse and adult mental health: A systematic approach. Trauma Violence Abuse 2011;12:38–49. doi:10.1177/1524838010386812
18. Lee C, Tsenkova V, and Carr D. Childhood trauma and metabolic syndrome in men and women. Soc Sci Med 2014;105:122–30.
19. Reingle J, Jennings W, Piquero A, et al. Is violence bad for your health? An assessment of chronic disease outcomes in a nationally representative sample. Justice Quarter 2014;31(3)524–28. doi:10.1080/07418825.2012.689315.
20. Coid J, Ulrich S, Keers R, et al. Gang membership, violence and psychiatric morbidity. Am J Psychiatr 2013;170:985–93.
21. Komarovskaya I, Maguen S, McCaslin S, et al. The impact of killing or injuring others on mental health symptoms among police officers. J Psychiatr Res 2011;45:1332–36. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.05.004.
22. Rhodes K, Houry D, Cerulli C, et al. Intimate partner violence and comorbid mental health conditions among urban male patients. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:47–55. doi:10.1370/afm.936.
23. McEwen B. Brain on stress: How the social environment gets under the skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109 (Suppl 2):17180–185. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121254109.
24. Keeshin B, Cronholm P, and Strawn J. Physiologic changes associated with violence and abuse exposure: An examination of related medical conditions. Trauma Violence Abuse 2012;13:41–56. doi:10.1177/1524838011426152.
25. Schnurr P and Green, B. Trauma and health: Physical health consequences of exposure to extreme stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.
26. Hart-Johnson T and Green C. The impact of sexual or physical abuse history on pain-related outcomes among blacks and whites with chronic pain: Gender influence. Pain Med 2012;13:229–42. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01312.x.
27. Bender K, Brown S, Thompson S, et al. Multiple victimizations before and after leaving home associated with PTSD, depression and substance abuse disorder among homeless youth. Child Maltreatment 2015;20:115–24. doi: 10.1177/1077559514562859.
28. LeardMann C, Smith B, and Ryan M. Do adverse childhood experiences increase the risk of postdeployment post-traumatic stress disorder in U.S. Marines? BMC Public Health 2010;10:437–45. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-437.
29. Polit F, and Yang, F. Measurement and the measurement of change. Philadelphia: Walters Kluwer; 2014.
30. Horesh D, Lowe S, Galea S, et al. Gender differences in the long-term associations between post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive symptoms: Findings of the Detroit neighbourhood health study. Depression Anxiety 2014;32:38–48. doi 10.10002/da.22267.
31. Felitti,V, Anda R, Nordenberg D, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. Am J Prevent Med 1998;14(4):245–58.
32. Public Health Agency of Canada. Alcohol consumption in Canada 2015.
33. Rotermann M, and Langlois K. Prevalence and correlates of marijuana use in Canada, 2012. Health Reports 2015;26(4):10–15.
34. Van Hecke O, Torrance N, and Smith B. Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance. Br J Anaesth 2013;111(1):13–18. doi:10.1093/bja/aet12.
35. Carleton R, Afifi T, Taillieu T, et al. (2018). Anxiety-related psychopathology and chronic pain comorbidity among public safety personnel. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2018;55: 48-55.
36. Bonner W, Andhoie M, Thompson C, et al. Patterns and factors of problematic marijuana use in the Canadian population: Evidence from three cross-sectional surveys. Can J Public Health 2017;108(2):e110-e116. doi: 10.17269/CJPH.108.5926.
37. Patten S, Wang J, Williams J, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of major depression in Canada. Can J Psychiatr 2006;51(2):84–90. doi/10.1177/070674370605100204.
38. Van der Pol P, Liebregts N, de Graf R et al. Predicting the transition from frequent cannabis use to dependence: A three-year prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013;133:353–59. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.009
39. Boden J, Lee J, Horwood Let al. Modelling possible causality in the associations between unemployment, cannabis use, and alcohol misuse. Soc Sci Med 2017;175:127–34.
40. Statistics Canada. New Brunswick and Canada. Census Profile, 2016 Census. Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001.
41. Eaton W, Muntaner C, Smith C, et al. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In: Maruish ME, ed. The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment, 3rd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004.
42. Van Dam N, and Earleywine M. Validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale- Revised (CESD-R): Pragmatic depression assessment in the general population. Psychiatr Res 2011;186:128–32. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.018.
43. Blanchard E, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley T, et al. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Beh Res Ther 1996;34(8):669–73.
44. Conybeare D, Behar E, Solomon A, et al. The PTSD checklist- Civilian version: Reliability, validity, and factor structure in a nonclinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2012; 68(6):699-713.
45. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, et al. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–49. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4.
46. Smith B, Penny K, Purves A, et al. The chronic pain grade questionnaire: Validity and reliability in postal research. Pain 1997;71:141–47.
47. Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(10):1092–97. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
48. Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, et al. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical Care 2008;46(3):266–74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093.
49. Bush K, Kivlahan D, McDonell M, et al. The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Internal Med 1998;3:1789–95. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789
50. Bradley K, DeBenedetti A, Volk R, et al. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcoholism: Clin Experiment Res 2007;31(7):1208–17. doi/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00403.x.