Post Traumatic Growth and Gender Role in Male Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse

Main Article Content

Hazel Lewis
Gundi Kiemle
Michelle Lowe
Robert Balfour


Background: Due to societal stereotypes around masculinity (i.e. men should be strong and able to physically resist an offender), male survivors of child sexual abuse frequently experience sexuality and gender role crises, as they tend to blame themselves for not protecting themselves. The negative effects on male and female survivors of sexual abuse are well documented. There is some evidence to suggest that female survivors may experience post traumatic growth (PTG), although less is known about male survivors and PTG.

Aims: To explore the PTG processes involved in the development of positive gender roles and sexuality in male survivors of child sexual abuse.

Method: Recruitment through national male survivor support organisations and via social media resulted in a sample of 12 participants from the UK, EU and USA. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed and analysed using social constructionist thematic analysis.

Results: The parallel processes of ‘struggling and changing’ and ‘developing and growing’ were evident in the PTG journeys of participants. Ten subthemes were developed, relating to gender role redevelopment; ‘Turning point’, ‘Redefining masculinity and sexuality’, ‘Reconnection’, ‘Resilience’, ‘Enablers and barriers’, ‘Appreciation of life’, ‘Living by masculine values’, ‘Attunement’, ‘Stronger person’ and ‘Activism’, highlighted the positive change experienced.

Conclusions: This study has provided much-needed empirical support for the development of positive gender role and sexuality following CSA, and has enabled conceptualisation of PTG in male survivors.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Men’s Health Across the Lifespan
Author Biographies

Hazel Lewis, University of Liverpool, UK

Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK

Gundi Kiemle , University of Liverpool, UK

Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK

Michelle Lowe, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK

University of Bolton, Bolton, UK

Robert Balfour, Survivors West Yorkshire, Bradford, UK

Survivors West Yorkshire, Bradford, UK


1. Davies M, Rogers P. Perceptions of male rape victims in depicted sexual assaults: A review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav. 2006;11:367–77.
2. Lowe M, Rogers P. The scope of male rape: A selective review of research, policy and practice. Aggress Violent Behav. 2017;35:38–43.
3. O’Leary PJ, Barber J. Gender differences in silencing following childhood sexual abuse. J Child Sex Abus. 2008;17(2):133–43.
4. Javiad A. Male rape, stereotypes and unmet needs: Hindering recovery, perpetuating silence. Violence Gend. 2016;3(1):1–11.
5. World Health Organisation. WHO global status report on violence prevention [Internet]. 2014. Available from: [Accessed 05/03/2022].
6. Home Office. Tackling child sexual abuse strategy [Internet]. 2021. Available from: [Accessed 15/03/2022].
7. Lowe M, Balfour B. The unheard victims. Psychologist. 2015;28(2):2–5.
8. Mullen PE, Martin JL, Anderson JC, Romans SE, Herbison GP. The effect of child sexual abuse on social, interpersonal and sexual function in adult life. Br J Psychiatry. 1994;165:35–47.
9. Lisak D. The psychological impact of sexual abuse: Content analysis of interviews with male survivors. J Trauma Stress. 1994;7(4):525–48.
10. Kia Keating M, Grossman FK, Sorsoli L, Epstein M. Containing and resisting masculinity: Narratives of renegotiation among resilient male survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Psychol Men Masc. 2005;3:169–85.
11. Easton SD, Leone-Sheehan DM, O’Leary PJ. “I will never know the person who I could have become”: Perceived changes in self-identity among adult survivors of clergy-perpetrated sexual abuse. J Interpers Violence. 2019;34(6):1139–62.
12. Horrocks R. Male myths & icons. In J Campling (ed) Masculinity in popular culture (p6-21). London, UK: MacMillan; 1995.
13. Bullock CM, Beckson M. Male victims of sexual assault: Phenomenology, psychology, physiology. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(2):197–205.
14. Peterson ZD, Voller EK, Polusny MA, Murdoch M. Prevalence and consequences of adult sexual assault of men. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:1–24.
15. Easton SD, Kong J. Mental health indicators fifty years later: A population-based study of men with histories of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;63:273–83.
16. O’Leary PJ. Men who are sexually abused in childhood. Coping strategies and comparisons in psychological functioning. Child Abuse Negl. 2009;33(7):471–9.
17. O’Leary PJ, Gould N. Men who were sexually abuse in childhood and subsequent suicidal ideation. Br J Soc Work. 2009;39(5):950–68.
18. Varese F, Smeets F, Drukker M, et al. Childhood adversities increase the risk of psychosis: A meta-analysis of patient-control, prospective- and cross-sectional cohort studies. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(4):661–71.
19. NSPCC. Estimating the costs of child sexual abuse in the UK [Internet]. 2014. Available from: [Accessed 13/03/2022].
20. Draucker CB. Construing benefit from a negative experience of incest. West J Nurs Res. 1992;14(3):343–53.
21. Simon V, Smith E, Fava N, Feiring C. Positive and negative posttraumatic change following childhood sexual abuse. Child Maltreat. 2015;20(4):278–90.
22. Stige SH, Binder B, Rosenvinge JH, TrÆen B. Stories from the road of recovery – How adult, female survivors of childhood trauma experience ways to positive change. Nordic Psychol. 2013;65(1):3–18.
23. Shakespeare-Finch J, De Dassel T. The impact of child sexual abuse on victims/survivors. J Child Sex Abus. 2009;18:623–40.
24. Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Posttraumatic growth: The positive lessons of loss. In RA Neimeyer (Ed.). Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. Washington, DC: APA; 2001, pp. 157–72.
25. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq. 2004;15(1):1–18.
26. Cordova MJ, Cunningham LLC, Carlson CR, Andrykowski MA. Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2001;20:176–85.
27. Brooks M, Lowe M, Graham-Kevan N, Robinson S. Posttraumatic growth in students, crime survivors and trauma workers exposed to adversity. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;98:199–207.
28. Kaler ME, Erbes CR, Tedeschi RG, Arbisi PA, Polusny MA. Factor structure and concurrent validity of the posttraumatic growth inventory among veterans from the Iraq War. J Trauma Stress. 2011;24:200–7.
29. Brooks, M, Graham-Kevan N, Lowe M, Robinson S. Rumination, centrality & control as predictors of post-traumatic growth: The cognitive growth & stress (CGAS) model. Br J Clin Psychol. 2017;56(3):286-302.
30. Morris B, Shakespeare-Finch J. Rumination, posttraumatic growth & distress: Structural equation modelling with cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2011;20:1176–83.
31. Borja SE, Callahan JL, Long PJ. Positive and negative adjustment and social support of sexual assault survivors. J Trauma Stress. 2006;19(6):905–14.
32. Stermac L, Cabral C, Clarke A, Toner B. Mediators of post-traumatic mental health in sexual assault survivors. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2014;23(3):301–17.
33. Easton SD, Coohey C, Rhodes AM, Moorthy MV. Posttraumatic growth among men with histories of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreat. 2013;18(4):211–20.
34. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
35. Willig C. Beyond appearances: A critical realist approach to social constructionist work. In DJ Nightingale & J Cromby (Eds.), Social constructionist psychology. Buckingham/Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 1999, pp. 37–52.
36. Foucault M. The subject & power. In H Dreyfus & P Rabinow (Eds.) Michel Foucault beyond structuralism & hermeneutics. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1982, pp. 208–26.
37. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage; 2016.
38. Ryan GW, Bernard H. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15:85–109.
39. Kübler-Ros E. On death and dying. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1969.
40. Rothschild B. The body remembers: The psychophysiology of trauma & trauma treatment. New York, NY: WW Norton & Co; 2000.
41. Sanford L. Strong at the broken places. New York, NY: Random House; 1990.
42. Harris R. ACT made simple. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger: 2009.
43. Burck C. Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: The use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis. J Fam Ther. 2005;27:237–62.